When the people entrusted to protect victims become another source of secondary trauma.
When a victim of domestic violence finally finds enough courage to report the violence being committed against her/him, they may find themselves walking into a police department, believing that someone will listen, believe, document what happened, and help protect.
Instead, far too often, they are told that what happened wasn’t serious enough, that it doesn’t meet the threshold for a report, or that there is nothing the police can do. They are dismissed, discouraged, or sent away without meaningful assistance. Sometimes, all it takes is a few words from someone in authority to make a victim question herself, lose confidence, and walk away.
The message is devastating: Even the people who are supposed to protect me won’t help me.
And if she/he remains courageous enough to pursue protection, they may eventually find themselves in divorce court, more commonly known as family court. They enter believing that a judge will recognize the danger, understand the dynamics of domestic violence, and protect not only her but also her children.
But for some victims, family court becomes another battlefield.
They may find themselves disbelieved, minimized, or judged through a lens that fails to recognize the complexities of domestic violence. In some cases, children are removed from the protective parent and placed with the very person accused of abusing the family. Allegations of abuse may be dismissed, while the victim struggles to find an attorney who understands domestic violence, coercive control, trauma, and the laws designed to protect them. They are additionally harmed – experience tdismissive, insensitive, uninformed, or unjust responses from institutions and people.
Some victims also begin to fear that money, influence, and power matter more than evidence. When an abuser controls the financial resources, the victim may feel particularly powerless, believing that the other party can afford better representation and exert greater influence over the legal process.
And once again, strangers entrusted with protecting them send them home without the justice they desperately sought.
The trauma doesn’t necessarily end with a custody decision.
A victim may find themselves ordered to participate in monitored visitation arrangements, pay spousal support, or meet child-support obligations despite having been financially controlled, deprived of resources, or left economically devastated by the abuser. When they try to explain their financial circumstances, outcomes may be they are ignored, rebuked, shamed, or treated as though their inability to pay is a personal failure rather than part of the financial abuse they have endured.
Instead of receiving understanding and meaningful solutions, additional emotional and psychological injuries are delivered upon them. The system that was supposed to provide protection becomes another source of humiliation, helplessness, and trauma. These strangers send them home even more desperate and devastated.
This is secondary victimization.
It is what happens when a victim must repeatedly prove their suffering to strangers who hold power over their life, safety, finances, and sometimes the lives of their children.
Think about that.
First, they are harmed by the person who promised to love them. Then dismissed by the people they turn to for protection. Victims fight through a legal system that may not understand the abuse. And sometimes, they leave those encounters carrying even more trauma than when they started. Sent away by strangers.
How many times must a victim be sent away before someone recognizes that the system itself has become part of their trauma?
Victims do not need pity. They need competent professionals, informed decision-makers, accountability, due process, and protection based on evidence rather than assumptions.
They need strangers who understand their responsibility.
Because when someone finally finds the courage to ask for help, the answer should not be another closed door.
Protection should never depend on how much suffering a victim can prove, how much money they have, or how convincingly they can tell their story.
No victim should have to survive the abuse at home only to be traumatized again by the institutions entrusted with protecting them. They should never be sent home by strangers who collude and have unmet personal needs.
Victims of abuse need advocacy with strength of purpose, strength of knowledge and strength of empathy who will not heap secondary abuse on them and then send them home.
Kathie Mathis,Psy.D